Let’s Make Plans to Electrify the UC

The climate crisis requires promptly retiring the UC’s

methane-burning fossil fuel infrastructure

News Highlights

  1. August 2021: More clarity about how UC’s biogas program functions like an offset, with the same core problems.
  2. June 2021: Members of our team publish an exposure in the Sacramento Bee of the offsets purchases of UC Merced and UCLA (further exposing the bankruptcy of ‘carbon neutrality’) – alternative open access link here.
  3. May 2021: Our public records request to the UC reveals key data on campus emissions and offsets policy.
  4. April 2021: President Drake’s representative announced that the President is “not ready to abandon carbon neutrality as our 2025 goal”
  5. November 2020-March 2021: Our team meets with Chancellors and also UCOP staff (President Drake declines to meet). We urge a shift of goal from carbon neutral to fossil free.
  6. October 2020: Energy Systems Petition, with 3,500 UC Signatures and supported by UC Unions representing nearly 40,000 submitted to UC administration.

The UC Burns Methane Gas on its Campuses

The campuses burn methane in cogeneration plants to generate electricity and heat.

The UC’s Massive Emissions Exacerbate the Climate Crisis

The burning of methane emits over 1 million tonnes of Carbon Dioxide per year (Scope 1 emissions)

Scope 1 is mostly burning fracked methane

The UC’s Current Approach to Climate Action is Outdated

The UC’s climate action plan is called “Carbon Neutrality 2025”. At this point, this depends heavily on purchasing carbon offsets, which is deeply problematic.

Stanford’s Campus Energy Runs on Electric Input

There is an Alternative: Early Retirement of the UC Fossil Fuel Infrastructure

The UC needs to make plans now to run its campuses on electric input instead of (mostly) methane. The electric input would come from a mix of on-site solar and the wider grid, which is increasingly sourced from utility-level wind and solar.